Infografía CBT oscura y tipos de personalidades myers briggs

Psychology infographic titled "Cognitive Distortions in CBT". COGNITIVE BIASES poster grid archetype. Editorial psychology magazine illustration in an academic textbook style, dark mode palette, clean structured layout, subtle grain, high contrast, modern sans-serif typography, balanced spacing, precise iconography, educational and non-stigmatizing tone. Render a poster-style grid of 10 numbered cards, each with a short caption and an evocative icon, visually organized for easy comparison. Include these English card titles and concise captions: 1. All-or-Nothing Thinking — seeing things in extremes. 2. Overgeneralization — one event becomes a broad rule. 3. Mental Filter — focusing only on the negative detail. 4. Discounting the Positive — dismissing strengths or success. 5. Jumping to Conclusions — assuming without enough evidence. 6. Catastrophizing — expecting the worst outcome. 7. Emotional Reasoning — feelings treated as facts. 8. Should Statements — rigid rules for self or others. 9. Labeling — reducing a person to one trait. 10. Personalization — taking excessive responsibility. Add a small educational sidebar with neutral CBT framing such as: "Common thinking patterns explored in CBT for learning and reflection" and a compact comparison legend with icon keys. Use visual metaphors like cracked lens, magnifying glass, storm cloud, maze, spotlight, falling dominoes, sticky labels, speech bubbles, scale, and pathway arrows. Include subtle background motifs suggesting analysis, reflection, and cognitive patterns, but no clinical setting and no depiction of diagnosis. Composition optimized for visual search appeal related to personality frameworks without presenting personality typing as fact. All text MUST be written in English (array). Every heading, label, caption, legend and metric name in the image must be in English — not English. Spell each English word correctly using English characters and diacritics. Numbers stay as digits, no diagnostic medical claims, no watermarks No diagnostic medical claims, no labeling viewers, no stigmatization. Frame personality systems as informal / educational, never as diagnostic tools.