← Back to catalog
🎨 AI Tech Architecture Infographic 🎯 infographic 📅 2026-05-26

Elastic Beanstalk Architecture Diagram: TLS Handshake Flow

Editorial-style elastic beanstalk architecture diagram illustrating the TLS handshake from DNS lookup and TCP setup to TLS 1.3 key exchange and encrypted HTTPS requests. The visual uses clean numbered boxes, directional arrows, and a cool blue whiteboard aesthetic to explain secure web application flow for developers.

📚 See all “elastic beanstalk architecture diagram” images →

Hand-drawn tech infographic showing a TLS handshake flow with client, DNS, web server, CA, session keys, API, DB, cache, and queue.
📐
Resolution1024 × 1024 px
🔢
Ratio1024x1024
💾
File size182 KB
🎨
StyleAI Tech Architecture Infographic
🎯
Use caseinfographic
📅
Generated2026-05-26
🌐
LanguageEnglish (EN)
🔎
SEO targetelastic beanstalk architecture diagram
Full generation prompt Click to expand
Tech architecture infographic titled "TLS Handshake" using archetype PROTOCOL HANDSHAKE (numbered exchanges), adapted for a mid-level developer audience. Show a clean left-to-right sequence of labeled boxes connected by directional arrows: Client Browser, DNS Resolver, Web Server, Certificate Authority, Session Key Establishment, and Optional Application Data. Include additional supporting boxes in a side lane for API, DB, Cache, and Queue as generic downstream application components, clearly marked as post-handshake application layer context rather than part of the TLS negotiation. Each box must contain an icon, a canonical English name, and a one-line English role description. Example box texts: "Client Browser — Initiates HTTPS connection and validates the server identity"; "DNS Resolver — Resolves the domain name to an IP address"; "Web Server — Presents certificate and negotiates TLS parameters"; "Certificate Authority — Trust anchor used to verify the certificate chain"; "API — Handles authenticated HTTPS requests after the secure channel is established"; "DB — Stores application records"; "Cache — Speeds up repeated reads"; "Queue — Buffers asynchronous jobs". Use arrows with short English labels showing technically accurate exchanges: "DNS query", "A/AAAA record", "TCP SYN", "SYN-ACK", "ACK", "ClientHello", "ServerHello + certificate", "Key share", "Finished", "Encrypted HTTPS request", "HTTP 200 JSON response". If illustrating modern TLS, prefer TLS 1.3 semantics with ephemeral key exchange and encrypted application data after Finished. Visually separate transport setup from TLS negotiation and from application request flow. Add a numbered legend 1-7 in English walking through the lifecycle: 1. Resolve domain via DNS. 2. Establish TCP connection with three-way handshake. 3. Client sends ClientHello with supported TLS versions, cipher suites, SNI, and key share. 4. Server replies with ServerHello, certificate chain, and selected parameters. 5. Client validates certificate chain and derives shared secrets; both sides exchange Finished messages. 6. Secure channel is established and application data is encrypted with session keys. 7. Browser sends HTTPS request to API; API may read cache, queue work, and query DB before returning an HTTP response. Add a small caution note in English such as "Conceptual diagram only — not an audited security reference architecture". Visual style: hand-drawn whiteboard, cool blue and cyan palette, sketchy marker lines, editorial developer-blog illustration, isometric or flat tech-diagram style, vector-clean infographic layout, high contrast labels, subtle grid background, friendly but technically precise mood. All text MUST be written in English (array). Every heading, label, caption, legend and metric name in the image must be in English — not English. Spell each English word correctly using English characters and diacritics. Numbers stay as digits, no real cloud-vendor logos (AWS / GCP / Azure) — use generic cloud icons, no watermarks No real cloud-vendor logos (AWS, GCP, Azure) beyond generic cloud icons. Common protocol names (HTTPS, TCP, JWT, OAuth, REST, GraphQL) stay in canonical English form. No security-claim overstatements (do not present diagrams as audited reference architectures).