Maslow vs ERG Theory Infographic | dwayne johnson mbti

Psychology infographic titled "Maslow vs ERG Theory". Use an educational COMPARISON POSTER layout adapted from a COGNITIVE BIASES poster grid style: clean academic textbook composition, dark mode palette, editorial psychology magazine illustration, structured two-column comparison with supporting numbered cards and simple theory diagrams. Left side: Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs shown as a 5-level pyramid with concise English labels for each level and a one-line educational description per level. Right side: Alderfer’s ERG Theory shown as 3 stacked bands or interlocking blocks labeled Existence, Relatedness, Growth, each with a short English explanation. Center or bottom section: a comparison grid with numbered cards and evocative icons explaining key contrasts such as number of need categories, progression vs flexibility, frustration-regression idea, overlap between models, workplace motivation relevance, and educational note that these are motivational frameworks rather than diagnostic tools. Include subtle arrows showing Maslow’s upward progression and ERG’s more flexible movement between categories. Add small iconography such as pyramid, arrows, group, plant growth, home, shield, and lightbulb. Typography must be crisp, textbook-like, high contrast on dark background, with neat headings, labels, captions, legend, and callout boxes all in English. Keep wording neutral, non-stigmatizing, and explicitly educational; no diagnostic medical claims, no labeling viewers, no personality typing of the audience. Avoid any visual or textual reference to the search intent phrase; render only the requested topic. All text MUST be written in English (array). Every heading, label, caption, legend and metric name in the image must be in English — not English. Spell each English word correctly using English characters and diacritics. Numbers stay as digits, no diagnostic medical claims, no watermarks No diagnostic medical claims, no labeling viewers, no stigmatization. Frame personality systems as informal / educational, never as diagnostic tools.