Maslow vs ERG Theory Infographic with isfp type motif

Psychology infographic titled "Maslow vs ERG Theory". COGNITIVE BIASES poster grid adapted as an educational psychology comparison layout: a clean poster-style grid of numbered minimalist cards comparing Maslow’s hierarchy of needs with Alderfer’s ERG theory in an informal, non-diagnostic way. Minimal flat editorial psychology magazine illustration, monochrome elegant palette, refined grayscale tones, crisp spacing, modern typography, subtle icons, balanced negative space. Include 8 numbered cards with short English captions and evocative icons: 1. Physiological Needs — basic survival and bodily needs, icon: water droplet or bread. 2. Safety Needs — security and stability, icon: shield. 3. Love and Belonging — relationships and connection, icon: linked circles or heart. 4. Esteem — confidence, respect, achievement, icon: star or medal. 5. Self-Actualization — growth and fulfillment, icon: mountain peak. 6. Existence — material and safety needs combined, icon: house. 7. Relatedness — social connection and belonging, icon: handshake. 8. Growth — development, creativity, purpose, icon: sprout or upward arrow. Add a small comparison panel showing key contrast points in English: Maslow is a 5-level hierarchy; ERG condenses needs into 3 groups; ERG allows flexible movement between levels; both are educational motivation models, not diagnostic tools. Include a subtle footer note in English: Informal educational framework, not a diagnostic or clinical instrument. Visually hint at search intent with a small decorative artist silhouette / creative personality motif only, without any on-image text about it. All text MUST be written in English (array). Every heading, label, caption, legend and metric name in the image must be in English — not English. Spell each English word correctly using English characters and diacritics. Numbers stay as digits, no diagnostic medical claims, no watermarks No diagnostic medical claims, no labeling viewers, no stigmatization. Frame personality systems as informal / educational, never as diagnostic tools.