Power BI Map Visuals: Pie Chart vs Donut Chart Infographic

Data visualization infographic titled "Pie Chart vs Donut Chart" using COMPARISON COLUMNS as the dominant visual structure to contrast the two chart types side by side, with two large central composition visuals: on the left a classic pie chart labeled "Pie Chart", on the right a donut chart labeled "Donut Chart". Show the same illustrative dataset in both charts for fair comparison: "Category A" 42, "Category B" 28, "Category C" 18, "Category D" 12, each slice clearly labeled with value and percent in English. Beneath or beside the two composition charts, add a clean comparison score grid with sharp English axis labels and tick marks on a 0–10 scale for criteria: "Part-to-whole clarity", "Label space", "Center annotation space", "Small-slice readability", "Dashboard friendliness". Give plausible illustrative comparison scores: Pie Chart = 9, 4, 1, 5, 6 and Donut Chart = 8, 8, 10, 6, 9. Make the comparison columns or lollipop markers clearly readable, no truncated axis, full scale shown from 0 to 10 with tick marks at every 2 units. Add 4 key insight callouts with small icons and hand-drawn annotation arrows: 1) headline number "42%" with note "Largest share is easy to spot in both formats" and a small target icon; 2) headline number "+6 pts" with note "Donut gains more label and center space for dashboard storytelling" and a small layout icon; 3) headline number "1 core metric" with note "Donut can place a KPI in the center, pie cannot" and a small donut-center icon; 4) headline number "4 slices" with note "With few categories, both work well; clutter rises as slices increase" and a small warning icon. Include a small inset annotation in the donut hole reading "Center KPI Space" and a handwritten note near the pie reading "Best for pure share comparison". Add a compact legend in English: "Red = Pie Chart", "Green = Donut Chart", and mark all numeric labels that are not user-sourced with a small tag "Illustrative". Add a small bottom strip reading "Data note: Figures shown are illustrative examples for visual comparison, not sourced measurements." Use hand-annotated sketchnote styling, high-contrast red and green palette with off-white paper background, black pen outlines, rough marker fills, sticky-note feel, editorial data journalism illustration, FT / Bloomberg-grade chart aesthetics, vector-clean infographic layout, strong contrast, clean spacing, crisp typography, sharp labels, sharp tick marks, and visual emphasis on contrast between chart forms rather than decorative clutter. Avoid any fake authoritative source. All text MUST be written in English (array). Every heading, label, caption, legend and metric name in the image must be in English — not English. Spell each English word correctly using English characters and diacritics. Numbers stay as digits, no fake authoritative sources cited, no watermarks Numbers labeled "illustrative" unless the user supplied specific sourced data. No fake authoritative sources cited (do not invent "Source: Reuters 2025" — use "Illustrative example" instead). No misleading axis truncation or scale manipulation.