Rick Owens Birth Chart Sankey Example Donut Infographic

Data visualization infographic titled "Sankey Diagram Example" using PIE / DONUT (composition) as the dominant visual element to show inequality. Create a large central donut chart with clear segmented proportions labeled in English, with sharp outer value labels, leader lines, clean legend, and precise radial guides and measurement ticks in English. Use realistic plausible illustrative numbers that emphasize imbalance: segment labels "Top 10% — 62%", "Next 20% — 23%", "Middle 30% — 11%", "Bottom 40% — 4%". Add a secondary small inset mini-diagram referencing flow imbalance so the concept of a sankey example is visually echoed without replacing the donut as the main chart. Include 4 insight callouts around the chart, each with a small icon, headline number, and short interpretation in English: "62%" + "Top decile holds nearly two-thirds of the total" + crown icon; "4%" + "Bottom 40% share only a thin slice" + warning icon; "15.5x" + "Top 10% vs bottom 40% share gap" + scale icon; "85%" + "Top 30% combined control the vast majority" + stacked bars icon. Add a small footer strip reading "Data note: Illustrative example only. Figures are not sourced and are shown for visual demonstration." Include a subtle note near labels: "All values illustrative". Visual style: dark dashboard, FT pink and navy palette, high contrast, editorial data journalism illustration, FT / Bloomberg-grade chart aesthetics, vector-clean infographic layout. Background deep navy, primary donut segments in FT pink shades with navy separators, soft grid accents, crisp typography, polished analytical mood, no misleading scale manipulation, no truncated comparisons, clean spacing, modern newsroom infographic design. All text MUST be written in English (array). Every heading, label, caption, legend and metric name in the image must be in English — not English. Spell each English word correctly using English characters and diacritics. Numbers stay as digits, no fake authoritative sources cited, no watermarks Numbers labeled "illustrative" unless the user supplied specific sourced data. No fake authoritative sources cited (do not invent "Source: Reuters 2025" — use "Illustrative example" instead). No misleading axis truncation or scale manipulation.