Plotly Data Pie Chart vs Donut Infographic Comparison

Data visualization infographic titled "Pie Chart vs Donut" using a PIE / DONUT composition chart as the dominant visual element: a side-by-side comparison with a classic pie chart on the left and a donut chart on the right, both showing the same illustrative category split to highlight contrast. Use realistic plausible illustrative values exactly labeled as "Category A 42%", "Category B 28%", "Category C 18%", "Category D 12%" on both charts. Include clear English labels, leader lines, legends, and sharp tick-style guide marks / measurement annotations around the composition layout for visual precision, with all labels and captions in English. Add a centered comparison header and small handwritten-style annotation arrows emphasizing differences in readability, label space, and center-hole utility. Include 4 key insight callouts with headline numbers, short interpretations, and small icons: "42%" with note "Largest slice stands out equally in both formats" and a small magnifier icon; "4 categories" with note "Simple compositions are readable in either chart" and a small grid icon; "1 center space" with note "Donut allows a central KPI or total label" and a small target icon; "0 axis distortion" with note "No axes needed for part-to-whole displays" and a small check icon. Add a small comparison note near the pie chart reading "Pie chart: stronger whole-circle impression" and near the donut chart reading "Donut chart: better space for annotations". Include a small bottom strip reading "Data note: Illustrative example. Percentages shown for visual comparison only, not sourced data." Visual style: hand-annotated sketchnote, high-contrast red & green palette, off-white paper texture background, bold marker outlines, red and green wedges, black ink notes, energetic editorial contrast, balanced composition, clear hierarchy, subtle shadows, sketch arrows and circles. Maintain honest proportions and no misleading scale manipulation. editorial data journalism illustration, FT / Bloomberg-grade chart aesthetics, vector-clean infographic layout. All text MUST be written in English (array). Every heading, label, caption, legend and metric name in the image must be in English — not English. Spell each English word correctly using English characters and diacritics. Numbers stay as digits, no fake authoritative sources cited, no watermarks Numbers labeled "illustrative" unless the user supplied specific sourced data. No fake authoritative sources cited (do not invent "Source: Reuters 2025" — use "Illustrative example" instead). No misleading axis truncation or scale manipulation.