Quantitative Data Graph Bubble Chart Infographic

Data visualization infographic titled "Tree Map Example" using a BUBBLE CHART as the dominant visual element, designed as a 3D scatter-style comparative bubble plot to show contrast between categories. Create a large central chart with a clear horizontal axis labeled "Value" and vertical axis labeled "Impact", both with sharp tick marks, evenly spaced scales, and no truncated axes or misleading scaling. Add a subtle depth cue for the third dimension with bubble size representing "Share" and slight shadowing only, while keeping the infographic clean and readable. Use realistic plausible illustrative numbers because no sourced data was provided.

Plot 6 category bubbles with strong contrast in size and position, each clearly labeled in English: "Category A" value 82, impact 74, share 28%; "Category B" value 64, impact 38, share 16%; "Category C" value 49, impact 88, share 22%; "Category D" value 27, impact 21, share 8%; "Category E" value 91, impact 52, share 18%; "Category F" value 36, impact 67, share 12%. Include a compact legend labeled "Bubble size = Share" and a small note near the chart reading "Illustrative figures".

Add 4 key insight callouts around the chart, each with a headline number, short interpretation in English, and a small icon: 1) "91" — "Highest value, mid-level impact" with a small upward arrow icon; 2) "88" — "Strongest impact despite moderate value" with a small target icon; 3) "28%" — "Largest share in the set" with a small circle-pack icon; 4) "27" — "Smallest value and weakest position" with a small downward marker icon.

Include a small source / data-note strip at the bottom labeled "Source / Data note" followed by "Illustrative example only. Figures are not sourced and are shown for layout demonstration." Keep all labels, legend text, captions, and metrics in English.

Visual style: retro 1970s magazine charts, editorial blue & cream palette, muted navy, warm cream, faded teal, dusty cobalt, and soft ink outlines; slightly grainy printed-paper texture; vintage editorial mood; geometric typography; restrained decorative accents; high contrast for readability. Composition should feel like a polished magazine data spread with editorial data journalism illustration, FT / Bloomberg-grade chart aesthetics, vector-clean infographic layout.

All text MUST be written in English (array). Every heading, label, caption, legend and metric name in the image must be in English — not English. Spell each English word correctly using English characters and diacritics. Numbers stay as digits, no fake authoritative sources cited, no watermarks Numbers labeled "illustrative" unless the user supplied specific sourced data. No fake authoritative sources cited (do not invent "Source: Reuters 2025" — use "Illustrative example" instead). No misleading axis truncation or scale manipulation.