qlik sense datenvisualisierung im Gantt-Chart-Vergleich

Data visualization infographic titled "Gantt Chart Project" using COMPARISON COLUMNS as the dominant visual element to show contrast between planned timeline and delayed actual timeline across project phases. Create a Reuters / Economist editorial look in dark mode neon palette: charcoal-black background, electric cyan, neon magenta, lime accents, muted gray gridlines, high contrast white typography. Editorial data journalism illustration, FT / Bloomberg-grade chart aesthetics, vector-clean infographic layout.

Main chart: a horizontal project schedule comparison infographic styled like a Gantt-inspired timeline but rendered as a precise comparison chart with sharp axis labels and tick marks in English. X-axis labeled "Project Weeks" with ticks from 1 to 24 at regular intervals. Y-axis labeled "Project Phase" with categories: "Discovery", "Planning", "Design", "Development", "Testing", "Launch". For each phase, show two aligned horizontal bars: "Planned" in electric cyan and "Actual" in neon magenta, making contrast immediately visible. Use realistic illustrative durations and start/end positions: Discovery planned weeks 1-2, actual 1-3; Planning planned 3-4, actual 4-6; Design planned 5-8, actual 6-10; Development planned 9-16, actual 11-19; Testing planned 17-20, actual 20-23; Launch planned week 21, actual week 24. Add a compact legend in English: "Planned", "Actual", "Delay". Mark delayed overlap or variance with thin lime connector lines and small duration labels like "+1 week", "+2 weeks", "+3 weeks".

Add 4 key insight callouts with small icons and concise English text:
1. Clock icon: headline number "3 weeks" with interpretation "Total project slip versus original launch plan"
2. Warning triangle icon: headline number "Development +3" with interpretation "Longest delay occurred in the build phase"
3. Calendar icon: headline number "24 weeks" with interpretation "Actual completion versus 21 weeks planned"
4. Layers icon: headline number "6 phases" with interpretation "Delays cascade from early planning into final launch"

Add subtle supporting annotations in English near the chart: "Early slippage compounds downstream", "Testing compressed after development overrun", "Launch moved to final week". Ensure no misleading axis truncation or scale manipulation; timeline starts at week 1 and is evenly spaced.

Include a small bottom strip labeled "Source / Data note" with text: "Illustrative example. Figures are placeholders for visual demonstration unless user-supplied sourced data is provided." Do not cite any fake authority.

Overall mood: analytical, high-stakes, modern newsroom, polished and credible. Clean spacing, restrained editorial typography, glowing neon highlights only on data marks and callouts, crisp grid and axis system, strong contrast emphasis between planned and actual timing.

All text MUST be written in English (array). Every heading, label, caption, legend and metric name in the image must be in English — not English. Spell each English word correctly using English characters and diacritics. Numbers stay as digits, no fake authoritative sources cited, no watermarks Numbers labeled "illustrative" unless the user supplied specific sourced data. No fake authoritative sources cited (do not invent "Source: Reuters 2025" — use "Illustrative example" instead). No misleading axis truncation or scale manipulation.