AI-generated sandkey diagram infographic showing a 2x2 grid of mini flow comparisons, with an outlier scenario marked by hand-drawn circles, arrows, and key insight callouts. The visual blends FT-style data journalism clarity with a sketchnote newsroom aesthetic, using red, green, and black on off-white paper.
Re-render this exact infographic with every label, heading and caption translated. We re-use all the original attributes (topic, style, palette, …) and only swap the language. Currently in English.
Data visualization infographic titled "Sankey Diagram Example" using SANKEY FLOW as the dominant visual element, arranged as a small-multiples grid of 4 mini Sankey diagrams to compare illustrative flow scenarios and reveal an outlier. Main layout: a 2x2 grid with one clearly unusual panel highlighted by hand-drawn annotation circles and arrows. Each mini Sankey should have crisp English node labels, clean flow widths proportional to values, and sharp axis-style reference guides and tick marks where helpful for scale reading. Use realistic plausible illustrative numbers only, clearly marked as illustrative. Panel titles in English: "Scenario A", "Scenario B", "Scenario C", "Outlier Scenario". Example node labels in English: "Input", "Processing", "Approved", "Delayed", "Rejected", "Escalated", "Completed". Use plausible flow values such as 100 total units splitting into branches; make the outlier panel show an unexpectedly large "Escalated" or "Rejected" flow compared with the other three. Include small numeric labels on major flows such as "62", "24", "14", all legible and marked in nearby note as illustrative. Add 4 key insight callouts with headline numbers, short interpretations in English, and small icons: 1) "48%" with note "Outlier scenario sends nearly half of flow to escalation" and a warning triangle icon; 2) "3 of 4" with note "Most scenarios cluster around stable completion patterns" and a grid icon; 3) "2.1x" with note "Rejected flow is more than double the typical level in the outlier" and a zigzag icon; 4) "76" with note "Best-case scenario completes the largest share of units" and a check-circle icon. Include a small source / data-note strip in English at the bottom: "Data note: Illustrative example only. Values are plausible sample numbers for demonstration, not sourced statistics." Also add a small annotation label near the figures: "Illustrative values". Visual style: hand-annotated sketchnote, high-contrast red & green palette with black pen outlines, off-white paper texture, marker highlights, energetic newsroom sketch aesthetic, surprise / outlier storytelling emphasis. Ensure red is used for problematic flows and green for successful flows, with neutral gray connectors where needed. Maintain honest proportional widths, no misleading scale manipulation, no truncated comparisons. Include editorial data journalism illustration, FT / Bloomberg-grade chart aesthetics, vector-clean infographic layout. All text MUST be written in English (array). Every heading, label, caption, legend and metric name in the image must be in English — not English. Spell each English word correctly using English characters and diacritics. Numbers stay as digits, no fake authoritative sources cited, no watermarks Numbers labeled "illustrative" unless the user supplied specific sourced data. No fake authoritative sources cited (do not invent "Source: Reuters 2025" — use "Illustrative example" instead). No misleading axis truncation or scale manipulation.
Tell us why this image is inappropriate. A description is required — generic submissions are dismissed. Confirmed reports are resolved within 24 hours.