Data Visualisation Power BI Gantt Chart Inequality Infographic

Data visualization infographic titled "Project Gantt Chart Inequality" using a COMPARISON COLUMNS layout as the dominant visual element, adapted to resemble a project timeline inequality view: horizontally arranged project phases on the y-axis and duration in weeks on the x-axis, with sharp axis labels and tick marks in English, no truncated scale, clear week markers from 0 to 24. Show 6 project workstreams with visibly unequal durations and delays using rainbow categorical bars: "Planning" 2 weeks, "Design" 4 weeks, "Development" 12 weeks, "Testing" 3 weeks, "Review" 2 weeks, "Deployment" 1 week. Add comparative overlays or adjacent columns for "Planned Duration" versus "Actual Duration" to emphasize inequality: Planning 2 vs 3, Design 4 vs 5, Development 8 vs 12, Testing 3 vs 4, Review 2 vs 2, Deployment 1 vs 1. Include a clear subtitle in English indicating unequal workload and timeline concentration across phases. Add 4 key insight callouts with small icons: "12 weeks" — "Development dominates the schedule and creates the largest imbalance"; "50%" — "Development accounts for half of total actual project time"; "4 weeks delay" — "Most slippage is concentrated in one phase rather than spread evenly"; "2 phases on time" — "Only Review and Deployment match the original plan". Include compact legend labels in English: "Planned Duration", "Actual Duration", "Weeks", "Project Phase". Add a small source / data-note strip in English: "Data note: Illustrative example for visual concept only. Figures are illustrative and not sourced." Visual style: minimal flat, rainbow categorical palette, clean white or very light neutral background, precise spacing, crisp vector shapes, restrained editorial composition, modern business infographic mood. Include editorial data journalism illustration, FT / Bloomberg-grade chart aesthetics, vector-clean infographic layout. All text MUST be written in English (array). Every heading, label, caption, legend and metric name in the image must be in English — not English. Spell each English word correctly using English characters and diacritics. Numbers stay as digits, no fake authoritative sources cited, no watermarks Numbers labeled "illustrative" unless the user supplied specific sourced data. No fake authoritative sources cited (do not invent "Source: Reuters 2025" — use "Illustrative example" instead). No misleading axis truncation or scale manipulation.