Gantt Chart Project Infographic for Story Telling Power BI

Data visualization infographic titled "Gantt Chart Project" using COMPARISON COLUMNS as the dominant visual element, designed to show contrast between planned timeline and actual timeline across project phases. Create a Reuters / Economist editorial dark-mode neon infographic with FT / Bloomberg-grade chart aesthetics, vector-clean infographic layout. Main chart: a high-clarity horizontal project schedule comparison with project phases on the vertical axis and timeline in weeks on the horizontal axis, rendered as paired bars for each phase: "Planned" vs "Actual". Use sharp English axis labels and tick marks: x-axis label "Project Timeline (Weeks)" with ticks "Week 1" through "Week 20"; y-axis labels "Discovery", "Design", "Development", "Testing", "Deployment". Planned durations in muted cyan, actual durations in vivid neon magenta, with thin connector markers to emphasize overruns and contrast. Use realistic illustrative figures: Discovery planned 2 weeks vs actual 3 weeks; Design planned 3 vs actual 4; Development planned 6 vs actual 9; Testing planned 3 vs actual 2; Deployment planned 2 vs actual 2. Add a compact top summary row with metrics: "Total Planned: 16 weeks", "Total Actual: 20 weeks", "Delay: +4 weeks", "Longest Overrun: Development +3 weeks". Add 4 key insight callouts with small icons, headline numbers, and short interpretations in English: 1) "20 weeks" with clock icon, caption "Actual delivery took 25% longer than planned"; 2) "+3 weeks" with warning triangle icon, caption "Development created the biggest schedule slip"; 3) "Testing -1 week" with check icon, caption "QA finished earlier and partly offset delays"; 4) "3 of 5 phases" with layered bars icon, caption "Most phases exceeded the original schedule". Include a subtle secondary contrast panel or mini-delta bars labeled "Variance by Phase" showing +1, +1, +3, -1, 0 weeks. Visual style: dark charcoal background, neon cyan, magenta, lime accents, restrained Reuters / Economist editorial typography, clean grid, precise spacing, minimal but authoritative newsroom feel, crisp legends and labels in English. Add a small bottom strip labeled "Source / Data note: Illustrative example. Figures are illustrative unless user-supplied sourced data is provided." Include a tiny unobtrusive design nod to project storytelling dashboards, but no search-intent phrase rendered as on-image text. All text MUST be written in English (array). Every heading, label, caption, legend and metric name in the image must be in English — not English. Spell each English word correctly using English characters and diacritics. Numbers stay as digits, no fake authoritative sources cited, no watermarks Numbers labeled "illustrative" unless the user supplied specific sourced data. No fake authoritative sources cited (do not invent "Source: Reuters 2025" — use "Illustrative example" instead). No misleading axis truncation or scale manipulation.